harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] define pre-commit testing configs to gain the stability
Date Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:43:19 GMT
Ivan Volosyuk wrote:
> What an interesting discussion! I have just read this out. :)
> IMHO, all of the discussion is focused on the scalability of
> bazar-like development as it exists here in harmony incubator:
> If something wrong is commited, then everyone has broken build or
> something doesn't work. - This is bad. System is badly scalable. What
> can we do here?
> If build is broken, then the cause might be found by someone and
> posted on harmony-dev. - This is good. And it has good scalability :)

Exactly -- we don't expect committers to be infallible or have every
type of machine and OS version that we intend to 'support' (i.e. keep
running), so we cannot have a model that requires such extensive
pre-commit testing.  Of course, we therefore need full community
approval to declare some revision of code stable, but our bazaar-like
diversity is truly an asset.



Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

View raw message