harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [general] version of gcc and other tools
Date Sat, 14 Oct 2006 16:15:59 GMT
Which is what the first message of the thread said.  We've come full 
circle :)


Tim Ellison wrote:
> Egor Pasko wrote:
>> I am OK with all. Some comments:
>> * we should explicitly say that it is a GNU make.
>> * the more restrictive GCC, the better. What is the most restrictive
>>   now? gcc-4.1?
>> P.S.: I personally like diversity in tool chains. Let's make a single
>> configuration not a must, but a matter of priority. So, we can
>> consider achieving good results on these two toolchains as the first
>> priority and fix bugs there first. Not because there should be only
>> one, but because there should be at least one.
>> Does it feel comfortable to everyone?
> I fully agree with you Egor, this can be a principal tool chain but we
> will be keen to hear about problems from anyone and we will strive to
> fix our code where it will help.  Of course, we will have dependencies
> on minimum and maybe maximum (e.g. Ant ;-) ) versions known to work.
> Regards,
> Tim

Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

View raw message