harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm][kernel] Should we be compatible with RI ThreadGroup bug?
Date Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:08:11 GMT
Elena Semukhina wrote:
> Classlib test ThreadGroupTest.test_setMaxPriorityI() fails on DRLVM because
> it expects behaviour that conflicts with specification.
> The test passes on IBM VME and RI. The issue is reported at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1625.
> Actually there is a bug report in
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4708197 which agreed
> that
> this is a bug in RI and it should be fixed.
> Should we follow RI's behaviour and change drlvm ThreadGroup.java or should
> we fix the test?

I'm off-line at the moment so cannot look at the bug details.  The
question is whether fixing the 'bug' will likely break any applications?



Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

View raw message