harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nathan Beyer" <nbe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][util.prefs] Implementation should be compatible with RI
Date Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:18:05 GMT
Can you provide a patch for the test case that correctly asserts the
specification's contract and passes on the RI? This may help for
someone to provide a fix for the issue.

-Nathan

On 10/11/06, Elena Semukhina <elena.semukhina@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> org.apache.harmony.prefs.tests.java.util.prefs.PreferencesTest fails on some
> machines when there are restrictions in access to system registry.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1751 describes the issue. It
> looks like Harmony implementation does not follow spec for
> Preferences.systemNodeForPackage(). Besides, the test is incorrect as well
> because it does not expect java.util.prefs.BackingStoreException on
> Preferences.childrenNames() and fails on RI.
>
> Could anyone look into the issue?
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Elena
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message