harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ivan Volosyuk" <ivan.volos...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][luni] signalis interruptus in hysock
Date Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:44:05 GMT
Why not? I understand your opinion, that EINTR should be handled in
upper layers. But here we have somewhat buggy (strange) implementation
specifics of select() and similar calls.
Good functions like read() and write() and so on doesn't interrupt
with SA_RESTART system calls, but select() does. I think it is low
level issue and should be handled in the same low level layer.
Handling it in upper layer may cause hard to detect bugs in that
There are issues with timeout handling here to maintain platform
independence (Linux implementation is different then POSIX, AFAIK),
but it can be solved with minor performance decrease.

On 10/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> Thanks, but we're not going to eat EINTR....
> Artem Aliev wrote:
> > Geir,
> >
> > I create HARMONY-1904 issue for this case.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Artem

Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

View raw message