harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Martin Cordova" <martin.cord...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][awt] headless support (was: Re: [snapshot] Questions about next snapshot...)
Date Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:17:57 GMT
I am just checking a dependency. Don't think so.

Regards,
Martin

On 10/25/06, Oleg Khaschansky <oleg.v.khaschansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could it be treated as a reverse engineering? I don't know :)
>
> On 10/25/06, Martin Cordova <martin.cordova@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't know how it works, but what I can do is try to use headless
> > without XOrg shared libs installed, and then take note of the missing
> > .so modules the IBM JVM complains about).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 10/25/06, Oleg Khaschansky <oleg.v.khaschansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > If you mean libxlib, how it could be used without X server? Maybe some
> > > other library (e.g. font library like xft) simply preloads it during
> > > its initialization or tries to connect to the server (XOpenDisplay) to
> > > get some data, fails and uses defaults?
> > >
> > > Anyway, I think, testing on a headless environment will help us to
> > > determine the requirements.
> > >
> > > On 10/25/06, Martin Cordova <martin.cordova@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> (e.g. for linux we need to exclude all xlib calls, right?). <<
> > > >
> > > > How implemented IBM their headless stuff? In their case it's a
> > > > requirement to have XOrg shared libraries installed to have headless
> > > > working. In order distros it was XFree libs. No need for an X server,
> > > > just the libs.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Martin Cordova
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/25/06, Oleg Khaschansky <oleg.v.khaschansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Right, that is my question too.  I've seen the general description
at
> > > > > > the URL Oleg sent, it's hardly a spec tho'.
> > > > > I don't think that spec for this exists.
> > > > >
> > > > > Another document on this is [1]. It describes what can and what cannot
> > > > > be done in headless mode. But we also have the list of methods which
> > > > > throw HeadlessException (from the API spec).
> > > > >
> > > > > > Presumably it is easier for us to find all the methods that
are declared
> > > > > > to throw a HeadlessException, and put in the isHeadless() test
right
> > > > > > now, so we can have a compliant headless implementation before
the GUI
> > > > > > is completed?
> > > > > This is only a part of a task. We may also need to guard native
> > > > > initialization code which depends on system configuration with
> > > > > isHeadless checks (just skip it in headless mode). And, probably,
> > > > > provide an alternative simplified implementation for some awt code
> > > > > which could be called in headless mode to prevent from falling into
> > > > > hardware-dependent native code (e.g. for linux we need to exclude
all
> > > > > xlib calls, right?).
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/Desktop/headless/
> > > > >
> > > > > On 10/25/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Martin Cordova wrote:
> > > > > > > Oleg, I just read it, does this mean that all methods that
don't need
> > > > > > > to throw the special Headless exception, are ready to work
in headless
> > > > > > > mode?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Right, that is my question too.  I've seen the general description
at
> > > > > > the URL Oleg sent, it's hardly a spec tho'.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Presumably it is easier for us to find all the methods that
are declared
> > > > > > to throw a HeadlessException, and put in the isHeadless() test
right
> > > > > > now, so we can have a compliant headless implementation before
the GUI
> > > > > > is completed?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > If so, we are just a step away for supporting headless?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > well we still have to get all the imageIO, print, font and other
code
> > > > > > working that is required in headless mode.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Tim
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Dinamica - RADical J2EE framework
> > > > open source, easy and powerful
> > > > http://www.martincordova.com
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dinamica - RADical J2EE framework
> > open source, easy and powerful
> > http://www.martincordova.com
> >
>


-- 
Dinamica - RADical J2EE framework
open source, easy and powerful
http://www.martincordova.com

Mime
View raw message