Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain gmail.com designates
 64.233.166.180 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: good
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=ET+DCioxDkZ9rfBvirUgSJGCXWGmhN2iW9kWHjjCl8X4v2fMdeFC0U9z1aCiB+GTHP3LCsMm9lGdYLci4kTYArollDTwZYDImq9DonO7haXUzE++VpMLRbMevYZ8UXx8uWlUO12HUckhDno1CgO9M5zYNURitTi3+wPhL0i5JRc=
Message-ID: <e0f125db0609230746y523d1b11uf219d874940277b5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 18:46:59 +0400
From: "Pavel Pervov" <pmcfirst@gmail.com>
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Closed: (HARMONY-1545) [drlvm] [jvmti] Unified JVMTI
 breakpoints infrastructure implementation
Cc: harmony-commits@incubator.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <5778390.1159018063497.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_6354_22567229.1159022819223"
References: <17259913.1158929302379.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
	 <5778390.1159018063497.JavaMail.jira@brutus>

------=_Part_6354_22567229.1159022819223
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Geir,

Looks like you've missed adding file
enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/jvmti_break_intf.h to SVN tree.

Regards,
    Pavel.
On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr (JIRA) <jira@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1545?page=all ]
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr closed HARMONY-1545.
> --------------------------------------
>
>
> > [drlvm] [jvmti] Unified JVMTI breakpoints infrastructure implementation
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: HARMONY-1545
> >                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1545
> >             Project: Harmony
> >          Issue Type: Improvement
> >          Components: DRLVM
> >            Reporter: Ilya Berezhniuk
> >         Assigned To: Geir Magnusson Jr
> >         Attachments: JVMTI-breakpoints-unified-infrastructure.patch
> >
> >
> > Hello
> > I've reworked the implementation of JVMTI breakpoints and single step.
> The code which sends breakpoint and single step events currently is ugly and
> uses unobvious logic. In the new implementation the infrastructure is much
> more clean and clear :)
> > Main class is VMBreakPoints. It is the container for all breakpoint
> instrumentation and handler for all breakpoint events. A VMBreakInterface is
> a class for breakpoints references container. It can be used for any
> purpose, be it SingleStep or user breakpoints container. In VMBreakInterface
> breakpoints instrumentations are referenced by VMBreakPointRef.
> > VMBreakPoints has handlers for native (JIT mode) and interpreter mode
> breakpoints. When such handler is called, the processing goes through all
> registered VMBreakInterface instances according to their priorities
> (currently two priorities are supported - SingleStep is first according to
> JVMTI spec about colocated events) and calls VMBreakInterface handling
> callback which can send an event of type which this interface supports.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>

------=_Part_6354_22567229.1159022819223--