Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18578 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2006 19:10:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2006 19:10:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 87580 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2006 19:10:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 87550 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2006 19:10:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 87539 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2006 19:10:31 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:10:31 -0700 Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org smtp.mail=geir@pobox.com; spf=unknown X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB Received-SPF: unknown (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain pobox.com does not designate 216.86.168.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.86.168.179] ([216.86.168.179:1479] helo=mxout-04.mxes.net) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 80/92-14537-52B79154 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:10:29 -0700 Received: from [10.253.139.173] (unknown [208.54.15.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D74AA3223 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:10:26 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <45196053.2030802@gmail.com> References: <001201c6e00f$cd563cb0$e842fb0a@LITTLEGUY> <45190292.5060609@gmail.com> <4FB1F6D4-D056-461E-8B63-405F6842414A@pobox.com> <45196053.2030802@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <93A5826E-0C20-45FA-95BE-EEE19D9377B0@pobox.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." Subject: Re: [classlib][vmi] VMI classes for Thread/Object manipulation for java.util.concurrent Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:10:27 -0400 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Tim Ellison wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> On Sep 26, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Tim Ellison wrote: >>> It sounds like you prefer not to split them, which would put an >>> extra >>> burden on the VM-port to implement more stuff. If they were >>> split then >>> the consumer (classlib developer) would/may have to use both types. >> >> Is that so bad, the latter? Seems like we get it right once, and >> then >> it makes it easier for others to integrate w/ Harmony classlib... > > Is that question to me? No it is not so bad, that would be my > preferred > solution, but Nathan indicated that he would prefer to put them > together. Yeah - mine too instinctively, but I've not been in that code... > > Regards, > Tim > > -- > > Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com) > IBM Java technology centre, UK. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org