harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Good issue resolution guideline (was: [classlib]volunteer to supply patches for old JIRAs)
Date Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:08:55 GMT
2006/9/15, Gregory Shimansky <gshimansky@gmail.com>:
> On Thursday 14 September 2006 16:55 Mark Hindess wrote:
> > I'd suggest two further things.
> >
> > First, we change the default JIRA priority to something lower than
> > 'Major'.  Currently most come in as 'Major' even if they are trivial
> > edge cases that might never affect an application.  I assume because
> > people are just leaving the default unchanged without giving it much
> > thought.  If we change the default, then the guidelines could suggest
> > only raising the priority if the bug affects a real application.
> >
> > Second, can we ask that all patches be relative to either the top-level
> > (where the main build.xml is) or modules/<module-name> (where a modules
> > build.xml is).  It bothers me when I see patches with files that
> > start with trunk/modules/... rather than trunk because I worry about
> > just how much these people are checking out.  At the other end of the
> This probably requires updating the page about downloading the source code on
> Harmony incubator site. The URL there points to the whole Harmony including
> standard/ and enhanced/ directories. I think there should be more detailed
> description about subdirectories in svn repository.
I do not see any problem here.
It is possible to checkout all the apache svn repository from the root
but make diff from classlib/trunk :)

Alexey A. Petrenko
Intel Middleware Products Division

Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

View raw message