harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][vmi] VMI classes for Thread/Object manipulation for java.util.concurrent
Date Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:10:27 GMT

On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:16 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:

> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>> On Sep 26, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
>>> It sounds like you prefer not to split them, which would put an  
>>> extra
>>> burden on the VM-port to implement more stuff.  If they were  
>>> split then
>>> the consumer (classlib developer) would/may have to use both types.
>>
>> Is that so bad, the latter?  Seems like we get it right once, and  
>> then
>> it makes it easier for others to integrate w/ Harmony classlib...
>
> Is that question to me?  No it is not so bad, that would be my  
> preferred
> solution, but Nathan indicated that he would prefer to put them  
> together.

Yeah - mine too instinctively, but I've not been in that code...


>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> -- 
>
> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message