harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rana Dasgupta" <rdasg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm] my latest round of patches broke something
Date Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:47:57 GMT
Yes, this makes sense. In that case, my vote would be to apply Atrem's patch
new_queued_cond_var.patch  in H-1519. Let's run with this and the new
thread.c( that we have already applied from H-1457 ) for a while. If we
discover no new issues, we can go chat about them on the APR list?

Thanks,
Rana


On 9/29/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
> >Thanks for doing this.
>
> >My $0.02 - right now, this is a fix that helps make DRLVM more useful
> >as we go forward, by fixing a problem in APR.  If we continue with
> >APR, we either get this fix in there or maintain ourselves, *or* we
> >throw APR overboard and do something else.
>
> >Either way, I don't see too much harm from a software process POV in
> >applying.  Seems like we need it now.
>
> >Thoughts?
>
> >geir
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message