harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rana Dasgupta" <rdasg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [testing] optimization regressions (was: Re: [result] Re: [vote] HARMONY-1363 - DRLVM fixes and additions)
Date Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:58:15 GMT
Hi Mikhail,
  I save the same observation as Egor, that jit optimizations should be
much more deterministic and their impact predictable. I understand the
unpredictability of the situation you described.

Thanks,
Rana





> On 14 Sep 2006 21:55:16 +0700, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On the 0x1E4 day of Apache Harmony Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > > In the example i've mentioned before the difference between optimized
> > and
> > > non-optimized calls was about 1000x. But the test sometimes failed
> > anyway
> >
> > Yet, I think, pure Java performance is more predictable than network
> > performance. I am also afraid to include performance tests to the
> > pre-commit process, but having these tests around would be nice to
> > track performance regressions from time to time.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Egor Pasko, Intel Managed Runtime Division
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message