harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][vmi] VMI classes for Thread/Object manipulation for java.util.concurrent
Date Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:16:03 GMT
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
>> It sounds like you prefer not to split them, which would put an extra
>> burden on the VM-port to implement more stuff.  If they were split then
>> the consumer (classlib developer) would/may have to use both types.
> 
> Is that so bad, the latter?  Seems like we get it right once, and then
> it makes it easier for others to integrate w/ Harmony classlib...

Is that question to me?  No it is not so bad, that would be my preferred
solution, but Nathan indicated that he would prefer to put them together.

Regards,
Tim

-- 

Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message