Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.182.188 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=PrkIJCEsQzzdmZQaJ44aLhcHXEqBuAaK+WwYwRkYcJGNoBnLyZYagZAGM8dXstYyV1cZHMY4cYMcGxqgnVzTQiM6hckOQavyP9L5ABVMq+hCI7II2IWZeyPZlSuHmG+G0wqOYxg58ZGnlc4tuOIsz1+D6xxJ7ed6BLxtzVMIDcc=
Message-ID: <c3755b3a0608080328qd3cf9d9ld342959a3e7ea34d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:28:53 +0400
From: "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org, geir@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [general] new snapshots up early morning... is the win2k problem
 gone?
In-Reply-To: <44D866FE.4070204@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8E389A5F2FEABA4CB1DEC35A25CB39CE24CF45@mssmsx411>
	 <44D84600.3080000@gmail.com>
	 <c3755b3a0608080303x3865fby856b9c7cadd331a2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44D86400.2070604@pobox.com>
	 <c3755b3a0608080321m5caf287fj73e1e056d46e9df5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44D866FE.4070204@pobox.com>

2006/8/8, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com>:
>
>
> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > 2006/8/8, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com>:
> >>
> >>
> >> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> >> > 2006/8/8, Paulex Yang <paulex.yang@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> >> hmm...of course we can get a workaround for now by providing separate
> >> >> build for win2k. But I think it would be nice if we can have a common
> >> >> win32 release(at least because RI has), it's just a little weird if we
> >> >> don't...
> >> > Anyway we should limit number of supported old Windows versions.
> >> > Because Win9x for example does not have a huge number API functions.
> >> > And if we will try to be compatible with them it will make life for us
> >> > much harder.
> >> > And what benefits will we get from this? What is the percentage of
> >> Win9x
> >> > users?
> >> I don't think anyone would suggest supporting Win9x :)
> > But we should limit number of supported Windows version and post it on
> > Harmony site.
> > Because "win32" is too wide here.
>
> Right.  We'd actually consider anything someone took the time to port
> to.  (WinCE, or whatever it's called these days, anyone? :)
>
> So right now, it's winXP.
>
> What else makes sense?  Does winXP really make sense?  (Just asking...)
Seems we want to add W2K :)


-- 
Alexey A. Petrenko
Intel Middleware Products Division

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org