Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17912 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2006 18:49:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2006 18:49:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 66255 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2006 18:48:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66205 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2006 18:48:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66194 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2006 18:48:59 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:48:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of a.y.chernyshev@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.195] (HELO nz-out-0102.google.com) (64.233.162.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:48:58 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id n29so1025195nzf for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:48:38 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GbwRKoftOWM+5ntTWYnvX3z14SjqK+4lYaCXJa8yMMEdVB0RihouDYFauTY2wz0aSR2aJu8s8dXa0T9ITRFLEkRIyXOHFqcvLyiHgZT+tMTk5V1WrMea26MZEhYE29PQnHjWE3CrzVW+qVGMw6cOpcMq6HEOxp3MzIy8h/dPetY= Received: by 10.65.20.3 with SMTP id x3mr8928149qbi; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.73.6 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6928c5160608221148qc693019v67b4f95754ac3dc1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:48:36 +0400 From: "Andrey Chernyshev" To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org, geir@pobox.com Subject: Re: [drlvm] problem when TM patch applied In-Reply-To: <44EB2CC4.1040202@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44EB2CC4.1040202@pobox.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 8/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > I've applied the thread manager patch (with some minor tweaks by hand...) > > All builds fine, and passes the smoke tests and the new [cool] C-based > unit tests. > > However, when I run tomcat 5.5.17, I have a problem - after the server > comes up, it throws an exception and then spins hard. Which platform/configuration you are running it? To be honest, I never run tomcat with DRLVM so I don' t know what the issue could be. I'm trying to reproduce what you described, but so far the tomcat seems to start successfully for me at least with win/debug: C:\temp\apache-tomcat-5.5.17\bin>c:\workspace\trunk-vm\drlvm\build\win_ia32_msvc _debug\deploy\jre\bin\java -Djava.util.logging.manager=org.apache.juli.ClassLoa derLogManager -Djava.util.logging.config.file="C:\temp\apache-tomcat-5.5.17\conf \logging.properties" -Djava.endorsed.dirs="C:\temp\apache-tomcat-5.5.17\common \endorsed" -classpath "C:\temp\apache-tomcat-5.5.17\bin\bootstrap.jar" -Dcatalin a.base="C:\temp\apache-tomcat-5.5.17" -Dcatalina.home="C:\temp\apache-tomcat-5.5 .17" -Djava.io.tmpdir="C:\temp\apache-tomcat-5.5.17\temp" org.apache.catalina.st artup.Bootstrap start ... ... Aug 22, 2006 10:14:46 PM INFO org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start: Server startup in 8653 ms I even can see a web page at localhost:8080... I've just got the fresh classlib and drlvm. Could it be that we resolved the conflicts differently? > > I've done a sanity check with last weeks published snapshot, and SVN > head w/o the threadmanager patch (to test if it's the classlib) and both > work fine. > > I'd like to get TM in so that VM patches can be based against that, but > I'm a little loathe to commit what appears to be broken code. > > So what to do? > > If we believe that we can get this fixed quickly against SVN, I'm happy > to check in and let people work on it directly - I think that would be > the nicest way to continue moving all work against the Harmony SVN... If I find what the problem is, I think I could suggest the updated patch or a follow-up patch that can be applied prior to the integration/commit. Still, may be it won't be a bad idea to integrate this code now because next time the conflicts could be harder to resolve - it really touches a lot. May be creating a separate branch could help for now? Thanks, Andrey. > > Andrey, et al - do you think this is minor? > > geir > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org > > -- Andrey Chernyshev Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org