Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 64.74.244.71 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of geir@pobox.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
In-Reply-To: <ca4b22060608170511y794cc067kb50786815948dd35@mail.gmail.com>
References: <44E3595D.60205@pobox.com>
 <ddda44ee0608170415j27c6bbe4qc1c25e33e4ab9c68@mail.gmail.com>
 <ca4b22060608170511y794cc067kb50786815948dd35@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <65B4D72C-DCDE-4566-98B3-8195520E582C@pobox.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <geir@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [drlvm] sanity check - can someone build from svn and test
 ActiveMQ?
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:14:32 -0400
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org

Right - what I was worried about was that I *thought* that  
HARMONY-956 got me to where Gergory is describing, but he's applying  
HARMONY-1179.

I'll just stop worrying about this for the snapshot, post it, and  
move on w/ 1179 and keep going.

Thanks all for looking into this - I could *swear* that 956 had a  
visible effect, but I was clearly mistaken.

And what is "dutty hacking"? :)

geir


On Aug 17, 2006, at 8:11 AM, Pavel Rebriy wrote:

> Anton, your patch is a dutty hacking.
>
> With and without the patch ActiveMQ crashes as Gregory described.
>
> On 17/08/06, Anton Luht <anton.luht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please try to apply patch
>>
>> Index: vm/vmcore/src/verifier/ver_utils.cpp
>> ===================================================================
>> --- vm/vmcore/src/verifier/ver_utils.cpp        (revision 432184)
>> +++ vm/vmcore/src/verifier/ver_utils.cpp        (working copy)
>> @@ -1391,6 +1391,9 @@
>>
>>      // get stack reference class
>>      class_handler source = vf_resolve_class( constraint->source,  
>> true,
>> ctex );
>> +    if(source == NULL) {
>> +       source = vf_resolve_class( constraint->source, false, ctex );
>> +    }
>>      if( !source ) {
>>          VERIFY_DEBUG( "verifying class " << class_get_name( ctex- 
>> >m_class
>> )
>>              << " (method " << method_get_name( constraint->method )
>>
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately I cannot attach it to the  JIRA issue because the  
>> issue is
>> closed.
>>
>> On 8/16/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>> > I'm trying to create snapshots, and when testing w/ ActiveMQ, I  
>> still
>> > have the same problems w/ ActiveMQ as reported originally in
>> HARMONY-956.
>> >
>> > Can someone do a sanity check?  it's a release build.
>> >
>> > geir
>> >
>> >  
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev- 
>> unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev- 
>> help@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Anton Luht,
>> Intel Middleware Products Division
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev- 
>> help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Pavel Rebriy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org