Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83262 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2006 13:42:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Aug 2006 13:42:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 2610 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2006 13:42:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2571 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2006 13:42:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 2560 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2006 13:42:42 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:42:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of oliver.deakin@googlemail.com designates 72.14.214.236 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.214.236] (HELO hu-out-0102.google.com) (72.14.214.236) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:42:41 -0700 Received: by hu-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 22so108423hug for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:42:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H/rctCuOYWlBP5eRRpid3i0YtZBPaV0Xj36nd0hSre5ECWMa8QHiJGJFv7xl2THfAFg1dmViaWntT3gh6jyeHezeXFRHU0LorkSbOSeC1Hs/aqt2uj8M6aYTehCYmbjt7UuT7DIozhUm7/o1ZeYVMME+1Du/UBm5iUWqF9Nje6M= Received: by 10.49.93.13 with SMTP id v13mr3568407nfl; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?9.20.183.162? ( [195.212.29.67]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id d2sm220252nfe.2006.08.24.06.42.19; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:42:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44EDACB7.3000404@googlemail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:42:15 +0100 From: Oliver Deakin User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ClassLib][Instrument]Put tests to Harmony (and Support_Exec) References: <44ED604C.6030404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44ED604C.6030404@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote: > Hi, > The development on instrument is going to an end (I may still > apply a few patches of refine). And the tests for it do help a lot in > finding bugs and applying compatibility with RI, and special thanks to > Stepan and "Support_Exec". :) > However, I still have a problem with Support_Exec, it usually, if > not always, meets a problem in loading kernel classes. Tracing into > the code, I find it add a parameter "-Xbootclasspath:" to launcher > with a System Property("com.ibm.oti.system.class.path", I'm using J9 > for DRLVM not ready for jvmti yet). But the property was null on my > workspace. After deleting that parameter, I get all tests pass using > both Ant and eclipse. So can someone tell me how to handle this? Or > can I make a little update to it? One problem here will be that com.ibm.oti.system.class.path went out with VME v3. In VME v4 we use org.apache.harmony.boot.class.path (see modules\luni\src\main\native\luni\shared\luniglob.c). Looking at Support_Exec, it appears that this setting is out of date and should be updated with the new value. Does this fix your problem? > > All existing tests has pass on both Harmony and RI in my > workspace(Linux/windows) when make a little change to lib name. Though > VM may not be updated for it very soon, I'd like to add tests to > Harmony, make it excluded first until VM ready, in order that some one > who is interested can check by making a little change and run tests. > Any comments/suggestions? Sounds like a good idea - it seems that the workaround to run on the IBM VME is pretty straightforward, so people will be able to run the tests if they want to. Then when a new VME is out and/or drlvm catches up we can make the tests "live". Regards, Oliver -- Oliver Deakin IBM United Kingdom Limited --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org