Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jfclere@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.186 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=mgXM1ymF5SnCWb7I6FlqRpxjnlkiLHFsHoRv3cLjNk4VppFbbdqzeOu2kkyndd+02NaNVODtJwygKnSuN30+epMeKGjYLpFayXfCtcq697IYE+ilZ5r7si6taFXS28TraxiiQh/6p9AI/Jv+tELc1cRXDwWQHzHuciLweC6qohc=
Message-ID: <44EC419B.1090205@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:52:59 +0200
From: Jean-frederic Clere <jfclere@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm] problem when TM patch applied
References: <44EB2CC4.1040202@pobox.com>
 <44EB7FEB.9030201@pobox.com>	 <51d555c70608221535o73c3ac76va6a261296607f556@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200608230256.40577.gshimansky@gmail.com>
 <51d555c70608221638h40032910mbebe4eb76ffc416b@mail.gmail.com>
 <44EBB78A.7020807@pobox.com> <44EC191B.9090200@gmail.com>
 <44EC2FBD.1010007@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <44EC2FBD.1010007@pobox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

> Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
>
>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> Rana Dasgupta wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/22/06, Gregory Shimansky <gshimansky@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >According to Geir the snapshot from last week lasted just one 
>>>>> minute more
>>>>> :)
>>>>>
>>>>> >It exception is the same, time is the same, then what is the 
>>>>> difference?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I most likely misread. I thought that Geir was saying that with the 
>>>> TM patch
>>>> the exception is raised instantly and repeats. Without the TM 
>>>> patch, it
>>>> happens after an hour both with last week's snapshot and with the 
>>>> current
>>>> SVN head.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So I've retried with a clean build, and then the new 1.2M patch from 
>>> Salikh (that impressively does apply cleanly) and both result in the 
>>> same - the failure I reported w/o 10 seconds of start up with tomcat.
>>>
>>> I think the thing to do here is :
>>>
>>> 1) really hope that someone can reproduce it tonight
>>
>>
>> With head without the patch I have (TC goes on working after):
>
>
> [SNIP]
>
>> Aug 23, 2006 8:37:42 AM INFO 
>> org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start: Server startup in 6611 ms
>> Aug 23, 2006 8:40:15 AM WARNING 
>> org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.acceptConnections: Exception 
>> executing accept
>> Throwable occurred: java.net.SocketException: Interrupted system call
>>        at 
>> org.apache.harmony.luni.platform.OSNetworkSystem.acceptStreamSocketImpl(OSNetworkSystem.java) 
>
>
>
> [SNIP]
>
> Odd.  What platform/OS?

RHEL4 on i686.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

>   Foro you, it happened in 2.5 min or so, not the hour it took me.  
> (Boy, this would have saved me time yesterday....)
>
>
>> I have not tried with the patch.
>>
>> The weird thing is that I would also expect it on the ajp13 socket 
>> but I don't get it.
>>
>
> Thanks for doing this...
>
> geir
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org