Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84863 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2006 15:41:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2006 15:41:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 91373 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 15:41:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91342 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 15:41:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 91331 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2006 15:41:30 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:41:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [69.9.190.6] (HELO lox.whirlycott.com) (69.9.190.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:41:29 -0700 Received: (qmail 13844 invoked by uid 1016); 8 Aug 2006 15:41:08 -0000 Received: from 70.36.208.192 by lox.whirlycott.com (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1179. Clear:RC:1(70.36.208.192):. Processed in 0.0367420000000001 secs); 08 Aug 2006 15:41:08 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: stefano@apache.org via lox.whirlycott.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(70.36.208.192):. Processed in 0.0367420000000001 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (stefano@ormaz.it@70.36.208.192) by lox.whirlycott.com with ESMTPA; 8 Aug 2006 15:41:07 -0000 Message-ID: <44D8B08F.3090101@apache.org> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:41:03 -0700 From: Stefano Mazzocchi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [general] contribution of Java management console References: <2c9597b90608080757l24cf5958h7120dc1d0df2d91c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2c9597b90608080757l24cf5958h7120dc1d0df2d91c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Alexei Zakharov wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for disturbing you again :) but I'd like to announce another > code contribution on behalf of Intel. This the independent > implementation of Java management console. RI has a built-in console > called "jconsole" [1]. BEA has proprietary "JRockit Management > Console" that is distributed along with BEA JDK [2]. One of the most > common purposes of these tools is to provide real-time information > about various Java VM resources and be able to manage them at > run-time. > > It will be nice if Harmony could have its own management console. > However, the developed console is simpler than the consoles mentioned > above and doesn't have such a well polished graphical interface. It > uses SWT graphical library and can be used as a plugin for Eclipse as > well as a standalone SWT application. The console provides > capabilities for managing of systems that expose JMX-compliant > management interface. This includes Sun VM, BEA VM, J2EE servers and > etc. The bad news here is that currently it cannot be used for > Harmony VM management since we do not have the implementation for > java.lang.management package in Harmony yet. But I hope we will have > some day. > > The contribution bundle can be found at: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1105 > > If you have any question please contact me, I will try to answer. > > [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/management/jconsole.html > [2] http://e-docs.bea.com/wljrockit/docs50/usingJMC/monitoring.html#1035332 Awesome!!! I love it. An eclipse plugin makes *way* more sense than separate swing app. Now I wonder, should this be shipped with harmony or should we make it available as another tool? Either way, I'm already +1 on accepting the patch because it would boost the work on the java.lang.management. Since this tool is dependent on nothing that is harmony specific, I think it might be worthwhile starting up as a separate subproject supervised by harmony... but I'm not sure this is kosher with the current incubation guidelines. Comments? -- Stefano. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org