Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of t.p.ellison@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.174 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=czAZigNJQ4LO3sQIQT7x445mH60t9OVSh/NQTgQu5AZhSYndyRreL2IqjPHRQKSlZBOyZzkC7fCf1KG7aD4hjQSVlpkPCEN/wr7rGRMRTEuHgwyiH0TEi94sZXx+AjX4o2tlPkUHnO83P1mOXsqDOm1VM+p6qXKKnaxTfgJj394=
Message-ID: <44D874E1.8040808@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:26:25 +0100
From: Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib]  Applying HARMONY-1084 - 5.0 patches
References: <44D854F5.20702@gmail.com> <44D86682.90303@pobox.com>
 <44D86D5C.1040609@gmail.com> <44D87085.7010807@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <44D87085.7010807@pobox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> The launcher changes wouldn't affect DRLVM, and it seems like the
> com.ibm.oti -> org.apache.harmony wouldn't either, strangely...

Must be using it's own equivalent property.

And generating 5.0 classfiles is ok, right?

So are we good to go?

Tim


> geir
> 
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>>> Once I apply the HARMONY-1084 patches, the classlib code will only be
>>>> usable with the new IBM VME v4 available now from Developerworks [1].
>>>>
>>> We need to make sure that DRLVM is ready first, although looking at the
>>> the patch, I'm not sure there's much to be done.
>> Right, that's why I put out the call.
>>
>>> Worrysome, given the boot classpath property.
>>>
>>> I am in the process of running for a plane. (There's news...)  Can
>>> someone verify that there will be no problem w/ DRLVM before we do this?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Can other VM folk let me know if/when they are comfortable with that
>>>> patch being applied?  The contents were described by Oliver, and the
>>>> patch file is short enough to read.
>>>>
>>>> The only potential breakages I see for you are the renaming of a system
>>>> property, and the launcher looking for a different DLL name.
>>> Right - that was my worry, the system property, but I didn't find that
>>> on first pass.
>>>
>>> The launcher change is irrelevant for now, since there are other issues
>>> that need to be fixed w/ DRLVM before it works properly w/ the launcher,
>>> where "properly" is defined as "having all the DRLVM artifacts in a
>>> /default or other subdirectory of jre/bin" :)
>> Yep.  Just want to ensure the *current* VM states are not regressed by
>> applying the patch -- we all agree there is more work to be done.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/harmony/index.html
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 

-- 

Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org