Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41101 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2006 10:48:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2006 10:48:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 83513 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 10:48:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83466 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 10:48:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83455 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2006 10:48:15 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:48:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of t.p.ellison@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.191] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:48:14 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a25so194661nfc for ; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:47:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ha0PhUIHl7R74fK2Z8tf7hVfZp7jIpr/WamLwxIT1lDoNXK3QTjFcd5xCQrWtPb9B+ogJwdfwIOoT5XsNDGaO316XFq0To9O3dvi8LcHsf5kGBIwa0oTfwRyZd7mRjkbDFIArz3ykzXjR992Spsj9B1iNZO6ZQ6iKW58qWtAD1E= Received: by 10.49.29.2 with SMTP id g2mr329970nfj; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?9.20.183.72? ( [195.212.29.75]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id z73sm204939nfb.2006.08.08.03.47.52; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 03:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44D86BD9.60907@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:47:53 +0100 From: Tim Ellison User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [general] new snapshots up early morning... is the win2k problem gone? References: <8E389A5F2FEABA4CB1DEC35A25CB39CE24CF45@mssmsx411> <44D84600.3080000@gmail.com> <44D86400.2070604@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <44D86400.2070604@pobox.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > Alexey Petrenko wrote: >> 2006/8/8, Paulex Yang : > >>> hmm...of course we can get a workaround for now by providing separate >>> build for win2k. But I think it would be nice if we can have a common >>> win32 release(at least because RI has), it's just a little weird if we >>> don't... >> Anyway we should limit number of supported old Windows versions. >> Because Win9x for example does not have a huge number API functions. >> And if we will try to be compatible with them it will make life for us >> much harder. >> And what benefits will we get from this? What is the percentage of Win9x >> users? > > I don't think anyone would suggest supporting Win9x :) Could be time to upgrade my Win 3.1 box then ;-( Seriously, I think it is fair to start at Win2k SP3. Tim -- Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org