Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3019 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2006 09:25:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2006 09:25:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 39696 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 09:25:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39652 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 09:25:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39641 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2006 09:25:04 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:25:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of t.p.ellison@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.190] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:25:03 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a25so170434nfc for ; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:24:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UOVuUEX1jUo1e0toY2R28BAVuM1mCUaXrqFF9HjTdSiWHWm73pB20fGv7wSIz2NfTxcqbhBGb0sCZYEYhLA3PkWgFO7BeYoGFAUML9M3N6iVwIuT2zHlplbdwIWIMxDNHL9klADHmk5B6K4pU7n3WmRME9ANIhSfh7m56xEBnIE= Received: by 10.49.43.11 with SMTP id v11mr440890nfj; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?9.20.183.72? ( [195.212.29.75]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id o9sm564258nfa.2006.08.08.02.24.42; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44D8585B.1010209@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:24:43 +0100 From: Tim Ellison User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib] Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-1088) ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder References: <29992279.1155013993889.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <906dd82e0608080052j9891340y7c1317c4cac4e4cd@mail.gmail.com> <636fd28e0608080058v23be7b73gebb610a209a62247@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <636fd28e0608080058v23be7b73gebb610a209a62247@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Alex Blewitt wrote: > I concur. We should not have any sun.* packages. Agreed, though deep down I expect that we'll end up creating a JAR that implements a small set of impl types -- for example, lots of 1.4 apps seem to use sun.io.CharToByteConverter and friends before the functionality went into 5.0. But I'd make it a separate download, called losers.jar. > Any program that explicitly depends on a sun.* class should fail. Taking the moral high ground doesn't help if the application is flat on it's back. Where such apps comes from a responsive group we should be bringing it to their attention. Regards, Tim > Alex. > > On 08/08/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote: >> I'm not sure it's legal to put any classes to sun.* packages >> >> Opinions? >> >> Thanks, >> Mikhail >> >> 2006/8/8, Martín Córdova (JIRA) : >> > ava.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: sun/misc/BASE64Encoder >> > ------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> > Key: HARMONY-1088 >> > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1088 >> > Project: Harmony >> > Issue Type: Bug >> > Environment: Windows XP SP2 latest Harmony JRE as of aug-8-2006 >> > Reporter: Martín Córdova >> > >> > >> > Harmony does not include this class. It's not a standard class, but >> has been of common usage for many years, and most JDKs (Sun, IBM and >> BEA) provide it under the SAME package. I think that there is no sense >> in not providing it under the usual package, it just breaks existing >> code. >> > >> > BTW, this JRE is seems to be running real fast. >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> > - >> > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the >> administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa >> > - >> > For more information on JIRA, see: >> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira >> > >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org >> >> -- Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org