Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25637 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2006 12:13:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2006 12:13:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 14933 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2006 12:13:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14868 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2006 12:13:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 14857 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2006 12:13:47 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 05:13:47 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of alexei.zakharov@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.184 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.184] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.184) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 05:13:47 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a25so142891nfc for ; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 05:13:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aO5ZVa/H2I7YWOr1ZsQwDpDv0GSiNgvM1IxCM+GJfrVQyx8oHUhUW26k3WtLGrj2bmhyHtpUQwkUTQ1VyfvTUsCTYHmiqXbPmpbkSxeF/RgRaWTeLfxpGsMbPZ7+yXDt7bLVcGJ++3EDYvYwA/1RtS42kn+pKw+yxb/m/NaiHhE= Received: by 10.78.177.3 with SMTP id z3mr307493hue; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 05:13:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.33.6 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Aug 2006 05:13:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2c9597b90608090513i16cff459rc0a94375b4ede50d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 16:13:25 +0400 From: "Alexei Zakharov" To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [general] new snapshots up early morning... is the win2k problem gone? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8E389A5F2FEABA4CB1DEC35A25CB39CE24CF45@mssmsx411> <44D84600.3080000@gmail.com> <44D86400.2070604@pobox.com> <44D866FE.4070204@pobox.com> <44D868B6.8090201@pobox.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I maintain two installations of win2k sp4 - at home and at my mother-in-law's home. And I run Harmony classlib + j9 periodically on the one of it. Regards, 2006/8/8, Alexey Petrenko : > 2006/8/8, Geir Magnusson Jr : > > > > > > Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > > 2006/8/8, Geir Magnusson Jr : > > >> > > >> > > >> Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > >> > 2006/8/8, Geir Magnusson Jr : > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > >> >> > 2006/8/8, Paulex Yang : > > >> >> > > >> >> >> hmm...of course we can get a workaround for now by providing > > >> separate > > >> >> >> build for win2k. But I think it would be nice if we can have a > > >> common > > >> >> >> win32 release(at least because RI has), it's just a little weird > > >> if we > > >> >> >> don't... > > >> >> > Anyway we should limit number of supported old Windows versions. > > >> >> > Because Win9x for example does not have a huge number API functions. > > >> >> > And if we will try to be compatible with them it will make life > > >> for us > > >> >> > much harder. > > >> >> > And what benefits will we get from this? What is the percentage of > > >> >> Win9x > > >> >> > users? > > >> >> I don't think anyone would suggest supporting Win9x :) > > >> > But we should limit number of supported Windows version and post it on > > >> > Harmony site. > > >> > Because "win32" is too wide here. > > >> > > >> Right. We'd actually consider anything someone took the time to port > > >> to. (WinCE, or whatever it's called these days, anyone? :) > > >> > > >> So right now, it's winXP. > > >> > > >> What else makes sense? Does winXP really make sense? (Just asking...) > > > Seems we want to add W2K :) > > > > Heh. I meant win2k. early. little coffee... > > > > But I'm still asking as I don't know the windows world that well and > > wanted to know what the guess of quantity of active win2k machines was. > > Actually, thinking about it, I simply agree, as where my wife works > > still maintain win2k as their laptop standard build, and see no reason > > to change it... > In fact I'm using W2K too! On my old toughbook used for off-road navigation :) > > -- > Alexey A. Petrenko > Intel Middleware Products Division -- Alexei Zakharov, Intel Middleware Product Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org