harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Anton Luht" <anton.l...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [app-bug] mx4j
Date Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:28:24 GMT
Not yet. I think that making minimal test cases from JUnit tests is
simpler than making ones from an application though. I'm going to get
down to it soon - I just wanted to discuss it before acting to make
sure that nobody objects such approach.

On 8/17/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> that's a great idea.
>
> Have you isolated any of the errors?
>
> geir
>
> On Aug 17, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Anton Luht wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Now some people in this list are trying to make ActiveMQ run on
> > Harmony. ActiveMQ is based on MX4J [1] . MX4J 3.0.1 has 812 unit
> > tests. Results of those tests:
> >
> > BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_04 JVM :
> > 810 tests, 1 failure, 1 error (99.75%)
> >
> > Harmony DRLVM version 11.2.0
> > 766 tests,  2 failures, 110 errors (85.38%)
> >
> > Maybe it's worth to consider MX4j JUnit tests first and then try to
> > fix ActiveMQ?
> >
> > MX4J is used not only in ActiveMQ but in other apps like Tomcat as
> > well.
> >
> > [1] http://mx4j.sourceforge.net

-- 
Regards,
Anton Luht,
Intel Middleware Products Division

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message