harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][html] Differences with RI
Date Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:37:35 GMT
I think that filing JIRA issue is right way :)

2006/8/23, Miguel Montes <miguel.montes@gmail.com>:
> Hi:
> We have found several differences between Harmony's implementation of
> j.s.t.h.parser and the RI. I'm not sure if these should be reported
> individually as JIRA issues, or should be discussed here.
>
> For instance, in j.s.t.h.p.Entity, the RI. encodes isParameter and isGeneral
> in the type, which is a public field, while the current implementation in
> Harmony uses two boolean fields. So, the value of a public field is
> different in both implementations.
>
> Another case:
> ContentModel:
>
> The method first() should return the element that must be the first element
> to appear in a ContentModel. If it's not unique, the RI returns null. For
> instance, for the following ContentModel:
>
> TITLE & ISINDEX? & BASE?
>
> Any of those elements could appear at the beggining of a valid matching
> expression. So, the method first should return null, because there is not a
> single element that could be considered as the unique one that can appear at
> the head of a matching expression. Nevertheless, for this example (as for
> some others), HARMONY-948 returned a value. For this example, a BASE value
> was obtained.
>
> There are several more. Should we post them as separate JIRA issues, o as
> one big issue, with the suggeste patches?
>
>
> --
> Miguel Montes
>
>


-- 
Alexey A. Petrenko
Intel Middleware Products Division

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message