harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] new snapshots up early morning... is the win2k problem gone?
Date Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:28:53 GMT
2006/8/8, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com>:
>
>
> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > 2006/8/8, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com>:
> >>
> >>
> >> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> >> > 2006/8/8, Paulex Yang <paulex.yang@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> >> hmm...of course we can get a workaround for now by providing separate
> >> >> build for win2k. But I think it would be nice if we can have a common
> >> >> win32 release(at least because RI has), it's just a little weird if
we
> >> >> don't...
> >> > Anyway we should limit number of supported old Windows versions.
> >> > Because Win9x for example does not have a huge number API functions.
> >> > And if we will try to be compatible with them it will make life for us
> >> > much harder.
> >> > And what benefits will we get from this? What is the percentage of
> >> Win9x
> >> > users?
> >> I don't think anyone would suggest supporting Win9x :)
> > But we should limit number of supported Windows version and post it on
> > Harmony site.
> > Because "win32" is too wide here.
>
> Right.  We'd actually consider anything someone took the time to port
> to.  (WinCE, or whatever it's called these days, anyone? :)
>
> So right now, it's winXP.
>
> What else makes sense?  Does winXP really make sense?  (Just asking...)
Seems we want to add W2K :)


-- 
Alexey A. Petrenko
Intel Middleware Products Division

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message