harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rana Dasgupta" <rdasg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] platform support
Date Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:47:56 GMT
On 8/9/06, Oleg Khaschansky <oleg.v.khaschansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Having different codebases is far worse, this implies separate test
> >suites, increased complexity of the build system and other bad things.
> >It would be better to avoid this if possible.
> I think that is a price you have decided to pay if you choose to support a
> platform fully. For a complex piece of platform software like DRLVM, to
> newly test and perf tune this on Win2K is not a small task. It is not the
> same as re-running the smoke tests. That is why we need to be sure of what
> our minimal platform commitment is. If it is W2K, we need by definition to
> test on this. If it is only built, but not fully supported ( run at your own
> risk etc. ) on W2K, the cost is lower.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message