harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From will pugh <willp...@sourcelabs.com>
Subject Re: [rant] Memory options in VM -- why is the default not 'unlimited'
Date Tue, 01 Aug 2006 20:23:43 GMT
Yes.  I apologize.  I stated it in the past because the issue was 
resolved in the past.  More precise english probably would have been either:

How did Kaffe decide to deal with SoftReferences?
How does Kaffe deal with SoftReferences?

Although, still interested in the answer to either of these questions.  
Do SoftReferences basically become strong references without a limit?  
Do they basically become WeakReferences?  or do they do something else?


Magnusson, Geir wrote:

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chris Gray [mailto:chris.gray@kiffer.be] 
>>Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 3:16 PM
>>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: [rant] Memory options in VM -- why is the 
>>default not 'unlimited'
>>On Tuesday 01 August 2006 18:07, will pugh wrote:
>>>How did Kaffe deal with SoftReferences?  Did they ever go 
>>away when you
>>>did not have a memory limit?
>>Why are we discussing Kaffe in the past tense?
>I assume because the resolution of the issue happened in the past?
>Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

View raw message