harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ivan Volosyuk" <ivan.volos...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: performance of drlvm
Date Sat, 26 Aug 2006 04:12:58 GMT
On 8/25/06, Mikhail Fursov <mike.fursov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/06, zouqiong <ustczz@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the key problem. I hope I will have an opinion on it when I read all
> of the articles you mentioned.
> The only idea I have now is that using an address of an object is not a
> problem. Once GC moves objects we can ask it to patch our references too.
> And now I want to know the schedule for this project.  I expect to join it.
> > But I am not
> > familiar with GC and interface for profile in drlvm, can you give me some
> > clue or
> > suggestion to learn them as soon as possible. Thanks.

What is your question about the GC?
If you can use enumeratable GC references, they will be automatically
repointed by garbage collector. In your case it may be even better to
use weak roots and weak references, if you don't want to hold object
when having the last reference to it.

> I'm also not a guru in GC, but I think there are a lot of people here who
> know the answers and can help in the area they are interested.
> So the proposal is:
> 1) You make the schedule and lead this project. I can help you with dynamic
> recompilation scenarios implementations and with JIT code generation and
> optimizations.
> 2) Why do not to implement classic Chilimbi algorithm first and enhance it
> with PMU data when it's tested?

Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

View raw message