Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 64.74.244.71 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of geir@pobox.com)
Message-ID: <44B586B2.8020401@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 19:33:06 -0400
From: Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com>
Reply-To: geir@pobox.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib] internationalization
References: <c79906b30607100414j7e135b50tc4d725c0df740673@mail.gmail.com>
	 <44B249F5.6020204@gmail.com> <44B3EF9D.4070903@pobox.com>
 <c79906b30607120127n3d3a0fadmb5e88c7a764bb00d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c79906b30607120127n3d3a0fadmb5e88c7a764bb00d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Ilya Okomin wrote:
> On 7/11/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Have you had any thoughts about a 'common' code set, that is copied and
>> modified at build time, setting the right package name and bundle name
>> by convention?  That would remove the need to duplicate the code.
> 
> 
> Yep, it is a good idea that we can use. However, in approach that I
> described here we only need to create MsgUtils class in each module where
> ExtMsg class static instance is to be initialized. In my opinion there is
> not so much work to do manually once and not to make build config files
> more
> complex.

But what happens if we change things?  You need to go revisit every
instance.  I guess it's not such a big deal - once per module - but
still, duplication is irritating.  I don't feel too strongly either way.
 Just suggesting.

geir

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org