Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99037 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2006 15:13:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jul 2006 15:13:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 75840 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2006 15:13:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75787 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2006 15:13:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75776 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2006 15:13:25 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:13:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [192.55.52.88] (HELO fmsmga101-1.fm.intel.com) (192.55.52.88) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:13:23 -0700 Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101-1.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2006 08:12:59 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx332.fm.intel.com (HELO fmsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com) ([132.233.42.148]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2006 08:12:58 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.06,229,1149490800"; d="scan'208"; a="96287479:sNHT659313200" Received: from fmsmsx312.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.227]) by fmsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:11:19 -0700 Received: from mssmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.125.2.10]) by fmsmsx312.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 08:11:18 -0700 Received: from mssmsx402.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.125.2.12]) by mssmsx411.ccr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:11:14 +0400 Received: from [10.125.151.180] ([10.125.151.180]) by mssmsx402.ccr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:11:13 +0400 Message-ID: <44B3BF89.4030104@Intel.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:11:05 +0400 From: Salikh Zakirov User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DRLVM] GC/VM interface discussion References: <4dd1f3f00607080911r7522156fv9cc11c36b0e23f7c@mail.gmail.com> <9623c9a50607100203u2605755fma3cc620f6e2ba617@mail.gmail.com> <12385bbd0607100559p54c12c90g8584b3293d2dac53@mail.gmail.com> <9623c9a50607110105u531225b2ma6792e62b6a13b45@mail.gmail.com> <12385bbd0607110518r75e9da2v5e8c5b25debadda3@mail.gmail.com> <44B3BB0F.4090706@Intel.com> In-Reply-To: <44B3BB0F.4090706@Intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jul 2006 15:11:14.0123 (UTC) FILETIME=[402099B0:01C6A4FC] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Salikh Zakirov wrote: > In fact, gc_alloc_pinned() is not intended to be equivalent to gc_alloc() > followed by gc_pin() for the following reasons And one more note: gc_alloc_pinned() is not used currently in DRLVM, so all of the reasoning was almost theoretical. (Functions gc_pin() and gc_is_object_pinned() are used in JNI Get*Array functions). --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org