Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 64.74.244.71 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of geir@pobox.com)
Message-ID: <44B26B0D.6080208@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 10:58:21 -0400
From: Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com>
Reply-To: geir@pobox.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib] Testing conventions - a proposal
References: <44ABB451.30806@googlemail.com> <44AE4113.1030600@googlemail.com>
 <44AE59E2.5080400@pobox.com> <44B25BEE.6020809@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <44B25BEE.6020809@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Oliver Deakin wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> Oliver Deakin wrote:
>>  
>>> George Harley wrote:
>>>    
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Just seen Tim's note on test support classes and it really caught my
>>>> attention as I have been mulling over this issue for a little while
>>>> now. I think that it is a good time for us to return to the topic of
>>>> class library test layouts.
>>>>
>>>> The current proposal [1] sets out to segment our different types of
>>>> test by placing them in different file locations.       
>>> ok - on closer reading of this document, I have a few gripes...
>>>
>>> First, what happened to the Maven layout we agreed on a while ago?
>>>     
>>
>> "Maven layout"?  We were doing that layout in Jakarta projects long
>> before maven....
>>   
> 
> Interesting - I hadn't realised that was the case. However, it still
> doesn't explain the missing "java" directory ;)

Oh, agreed.  We definitely should normalize this.

> 
>> This is a fun thread.  I plan to read it from end to end later today and
>> comment.
>>
>> Initial thoughts are that I've been wanting to use TestNG for months
>> (hence my resistance to any JUnit deps more than we needed to) and
>> second, annotations won't solve our problems.  More later :)
>>   
> 
> No, annotations will not solve *all* our problems - but, as you probably
> already know, they may solve some of those recently discussed on this
> list when used in conjunction with TestNG (such as platform specific
> tests, test exclusions etc.).

Maybe :)

geir

> 
> Regards,
> Oliver
> 
> 
>> geir
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>>   
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org