Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27132 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2006 11:39:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2006 11:39:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 83529 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2006 11:39:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83039 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2006 11:39:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83028 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2006 11:39:32 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 04:39:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of thunderaxiom@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.168 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.168] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.168) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 04:39:31 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id q2so1712086uge for ; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 04:39:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ot1y4h4OghTuEh302vi8pd1fpG7iAPuO+LIvHwrQvnRT7hdrvyV5WFuc4S6SLwokUf7p/X0JLboj615XWVCPDGEVGfoU9UTB8qKVD06I+WUGmpH6k/grNyY1tCSsap4D2cL/1NISkCRkP5rOGcsPUXF0We7dLg7PHQTbQuxz8pE= Received: by 10.67.100.17 with SMTP id c17mr7655051ugm; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 04:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.2? ( [62.66.224.229]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id s1sm1422205uge.2006.07.05.04.39.08; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 04:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44ABA4DD.6030701@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 13:39:09 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thorbj=F8rn_Ravn_Andersen?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Using Visual Studio C++ Express to compile classlib - fails. References: <200606261957.k5QJvjVY022608@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <44A0439E.9070808@gmail.com> <44A107A3.201@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <44A107A3.201@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Oliver Deakin skrev den 27-06-2006 12:25: > Do you mean the header files in deploy/include? If so, the reason they > are copied > there is so that they are in a shared location for all modules. (In > fact it's the same > reason that libs are built into deploy/lib and makefile includes are > copied into > deploy/build/make). So it is basically a platform agnostic symbolic link? Personally I do not like doing it so, would it be possible to do it with -I's instead so we do not have redundant copies lying around? > As a consequence, they could also *only* checkout the module they are > interested in, rather than the whole of classlib/trunk, and still be > able to rebuild > their altered code. I have heard this discussion, but I am not convinced that having lots of different building enviroments is a good idea. I can however also appreciate tolerable build times :) -- Thorbj�rn --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org