harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Fridlender" <dfridlen...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] resolution of rmi/math/crypto duplication?
Date Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:00:56 GMT
On 7/21/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
> Daniel Fridlender wrote:
> > On 7/21/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> >> > While it's not a critical thing, this seems like something we want to
> >> > put to bed.  Tim tried taking a run at this for one of these last week,
> >> > and I'd like to try again.
> >> >
> >> > Would some number of days of discussion (like 3) plus a vote be an
> >> > acceptable way to get this resolved?
> >>
> >> Yes.  IMHO there is better value in performing a quick comparison and
> >> choosing one to work on and improve, compared to spending a long time
> >> evaluating the two/three impls.
> >
> > In the case of java.math I think we should pick the new implementation
> > (H-935 which combines H-380 and H-199 and some of H-551) to improve
> > from now on.
>
> It doesn't surprise me that you'd say that :)
>
> What is your opinion for RMI?

I am the wrong Daniel to answer that.  I don't know enough about rmi
to compare the two implementations.

Daniel

>
> geir
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message