harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Fursov" <mike.fur...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][html] HTML 3.2 or 4.01
Date Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:31:01 GMT
BTW there are a lot of other RFEs:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/top25_rfes.do Sun is asked to implement.
Some of them are very interesting and could be implemented in Harmony as JDK
extentions: struct/hotcode replacement/ftp support/logging support with
ability to remove it from code like 'assert' keyword..


On 7/23/06, shen yu <smallsmallorgan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, AFAIK, SUN still does not support DTD 4.01 in JAVA 6.Refer to [1]
> May be they will wait for JAVA 7. And many
> developers are calling for DTD 4.01 support. IMO, it's a good idea to
> support DTD 4.01 in our project.
>
> Best regards
>
> [1]http://download.java.net/jdk6/docs/api/
>
>
> 2006/7/22, Mikhail Fursov <mike.fursov@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Which one should we follow? ┬┐Both? The parser behavior is
> parameterized
> > by
> > > a DTD, so perhaps we should provide a 3.2 DTD, to be compatible with
> > Sun,
> > > and a 4.01 DTD.
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Miguel Montes
> > >
> >
> > This RFE is about 7 years old and AFAIK SUN does not want to fix it in
> the
> > nearest feature:
> > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4296022
> > Miguel, your proposal to support both versions sounds very reasonable.
> > This
> > way we can move a progress and to have influence on Java.
> >
> > --
> > Mikhail Fursov
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Spark Shen
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
>


-- 
Mikhail Fursov

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message