harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marina Goldburt" <marina.v.goldb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: portlib functionality
Date Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:09:14 GMT
On 7/25/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:

>If you honour the existing table layout then you don't need to break
>compatibility.  In addition, VMs are not required to use the class
>library portlib if they choose not to.

I don't know the way IBM VME uses the portlibrary, but concerning the DRLVM
(vm/vmi/src/vmi.cpp), the DRLVM needs recompilation if the HyPortLibrary
structure changes as Paulex described.

>> But it's ok since
> >Harmony has its own vm and nobody uses j9 vm binaries.

>This is a joke right?  There are three VMs in various states of
>development at Harmony, and people are also using the IBM VME.

As the official Apache Harmony site doesn't have the link to IBM VME, I
thought people are not using it.
And about IBM VME, are there any plans to publish the binaries for 64-bit
platforms?

Thanks, Marina

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message