harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Zhang" <zhanghuang...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] compatibility nuances
Date Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:03:44 GMT
On 7/13/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> I assume you mean [drlvm], since java.lang.Class in [classlib] is just a
> stub, right?
>
> Anyway, what would you say exactly?  That our "not in any particular
> order" is different than the "not in any particular order" that the RI
> does?  I'm not trying to make light of it, but it sounds like all is
> correct.


IMHO, If Harmony VM could act the same as that of RI, the thing would
be better.

geir
>
> Alexei Zakharov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have discovered we have small incompatibility in our java.lang.Class
> > implementation. The order of elements returned by
> > Class.getDeclaredMethods() differs from RI. The spec says here: "The
> > elements in the array returned are not sorted and are not in any
> > particular order." But I already know one application that relies on
> > this - this was one of java.beans test (already patched). I don't want
> > to say this is somehow bad but still like to inform the community
> > about this issue. Probably we need to rise non-bug differences JIRA?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Andrew Zhang
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message