harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] resolution of rmi/math/crypto duplication?
Date Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:47:48 GMT


Daniel Fridlender wrote:
> On 7/21/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> > While it's not a critical thing, this seems like something we want to
>> > put to bed.  Tim tried taking a run at this for one of these last week,
>> > and I'd like to try again.
>> >
>> > Would some number of days of discussion (like 3) plus a vote be an
>> > acceptable way to get this resolved?
>>
>> Yes.  IMHO there is better value in performing a quick comparison and
>> choosing one to work on and improve, compared to spending a long time
>> evaluating the two/three impls.
> 
> In the case of java.math I think we should pick the new implementation
> (H-935 which combines H-380 and H-199 and some of H-551) to improve
> from now on.

It doesn't surprise me that you'd say that :)

What is your opinion for RMI?

geir


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message