harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm] proposals for VM internationalization
Date Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:24:55 GMT
we stand corrected.  Both need localization, and we should be able to
find commonality in the approaches.

geir


Salikh Zakirov wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> I don't know if this is being considered, but
>>
>> 1) Classlib has lots of java internationalization needs, and some native
>> internationalization needs
>>
>> 2) DRLVM has lots of native internationalization needs, and some java
>> needs (kernel classes).
> 
> FWIW, I as far as I can figure from both [drlvm] and [classlib] discussions,
> the topic is *localization*, i.e. providing the user with the messages 
> in native language of the user.
> 
> Concerning *internationalization* Java code is internationalized by design,
> and DRLVM needs some fixes to achieve it, at least
> * accept non-ascii class names in locale-specific encoding
> 
> For more information about "i18n vs l10n", see
> http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-i18n
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message