Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54873 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2006 12:25:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jun 2006 12:25:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 10347 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2006 12:25:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10305 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2006 12:25:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10293 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2006 12:25:13 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:25:13 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of alexey.v.varlamov@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.206 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.206] (HELO wx-out-0102.google.com) (66.249.82.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:25:12 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s6so1075550wxc for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:24:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YWh80P4X+BfiD8E9L5EVdBJCMcv9l36HHv+rG9aC/4X2tnjrZCBRNHw3J0jTYJvD4AO7FAXkqTcx5DZNVykh/Mo/hiIgEMiFVOv+2tJQy3gU6SwH87ANoTsjemnKE1fLGjYrkYt1O/+zpNakSctgjX7QlyvX3Kmeo2j+/Hf74yw= Received: by 10.70.39.19 with SMTP id m19mr7547646wxm; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.31.3 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 05:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:24:51 +0700 From: "Alexey Varlamov" To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib] StringBuilder vs StringBuffer In-Reply-To: <000301c68ca7$9dae22e0$0f01a8c0@LITTLEGUY> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <000301c68ca7$9dae22e0$0f01a8c0@LITTLEGUY> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nathan, I've attached suggested fix to the JIRA issue. Seems that now we can even beat the Reference Implementation on the microbenchmark ;) No new test failures introduced, I assume this is enough to ensure patch correctness. 2006/6/10, Nathan Beyer : > Go for it. Just work out your changes, create a patch and attach it to the > issue you opened. In terms of passivity, one of the key implementation > aspects to consider is that serialization works correctly for both classes > afterwards. > > -Nathan --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org