Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55931 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2006 15:53:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jun 2006 15:53:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 36399 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 15:53:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36351 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 15:53:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36339 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2006 15:53:54 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:53:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.224] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:53:53 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so666997wra for ; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:53:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=knVct1RLWULNLw/64DxMNhma/OOAQy/85gC+AxjSWJX/lcUvxAbBPtrHs3jTQBXD8YucyS9WYhRAqnp/bVsL2qah8dzts5cbWvBsGTQIncXp79AhGbtUnew2eBdZObdJ4qCatRwFuiSabPBxzpTlRCCC26bogM6R4SmL9UV3uk4= Received: by 10.64.112.8 with SMTP id k8mr1833580qbc; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.112.17 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 19:53:31 +0400 From: "Alexey Petrenko" To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib] moving to 1.5 for real - discuss In-Reply-To: <200606081402.k58E2n9i025585@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44881964.1020803@pobox.com> <200606081402.k58E2n9i025585@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Mark, I understand your concerns about static linking of the large number of the libraries... We thought about this too... But we decided that for now it is the best way: we have to manage only few libraries inside the Harmony deploy directory... Which is changing its contents so often :) Anyway it can be easily changed at any time. Another question about binary builds: Can we distribute third party libraries in the binary form from the Apache site? Geir? Tim? 2006/6/8, Mark Hindess : > > On 8 June 2006 at 8:34, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > > > Mark Hindess wrote: > > > On 8 June 2006 at 7:01, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > >> I'm +1 except I'd like to see us get to the point where we can > > >> > > >> - produce a full snapshot of classlib + VM (using DRLVM or JCHEVM or > > >> whatever) > > > > > > I agree. I'd quite like to see a snapshot with a "free" vm and as much > > > of the classlib as possible preferably awt/swing and mx4j (anyone looked > > > at HARMONY-560? Comments?). > > > > > > If it is acceptable, I'd very much like to create some snapshots in the > > > form of debian and rpm packages to see if we can encourage the masses > > > to give Harmony a try. > > > > YEAH! > > > > > (At the moment I think these packages might > > > be pretty fat since we don't do much to make use of locally installed > > > packages for things like zlib, libpng, liblcms, etc. But I still think > > > this (packaging) is worth doing and I'm prepared to work on trimming the > > > fat later.) > > > > Cool - getting those started would be cool, and we just evolve them. > > > > How does it work "in real life"? Are there linux packaging 'czars' > > that we might convince to start making these regularly available? > > When the time comes, I think we could find a Debian Developer sponsor > without too much trouble but they are going to tell us to "go away" > until we start behaving slightly more reasonably with respect to > dependencies. That is, using what is already installed rather than > including them. > > Not sure what the process is like for RPM-based packages but I'm sure > they'll have the same issues about any "official" distribution packages. > > In the meantime, we could just host raw packages or (more work) create > apt/yum repositories. I think we'll have to do it ourselves at least > until we get a little closer to world domination. ;-) > > (Aside: I'm not criticising the choice to use static or > download-and-build dependencies. This is a sound pragmatic choice at > this stage. It's just not a good way to fit in when we want wider > acceptance.) > > I have a few ideas for how we can start to do this better on Linux. > I've no idea about Windows but I suspect the bar for what it acceptable > is a little lower there. > > Regards, > Mark. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org > > -- Alexey A. Petrenko Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org