harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Loenko" <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] Exception-throwing compatibility question
Date Fri, 30 Jun 2006 09:10:00 GMT
For the example I've started this thread with it seems that complying
the spec is
more appropriate there. But probably there are other examples that
caused that the doc was worded the given way

George and Tim could you please comment?

Thanks,
Mikhail


2006/6/30, Paulex Yang <paulex.yang@gmail.com>:
> Anton Avtamonov wrote:
> > On 6/30/06, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> But section "Exception-throwing compatibility" says that exceptions
> >> are different
> >> and we aim "to be fully compartible with the RI" "by matching the
> >> exception characteristics of each method".
> >
> > I believe that it is for "However, in most cases the specification
> > does not describe all possible exceptions that may be thrown" case
> > only.
> > In case the spec is complete and not looks like a bug I would vote to
> > follow the spec.
> +1 from me.
> >
> > Wishes,
>
>
> --
> Paulex Yang
> China Software Development Lab
> IBM
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message