harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Magnusson, Geir" <geir.magnus...@intel.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r416738 - /incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/src/init/bootclasspath.properties
Date Mon, 26 Jun 2006 10:18:59 GMT
Its an element of uncertainty because if you change the load order, surprises can happen.

I understand the need for compilation, but don't see why they are necessary in jars for deployment...

Geir

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tim Ellison [mailto:t.p.ellison@gmail.com]
Sent:	Monday, June 26, 2006 02:30 AM Pacific Standard Time
To:	harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject:	Re: svn commit: r416738 - /incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/src/init/bootclasspath.properties

Magnusson, Geir wrote:
> Isn't it better to not have the stubs around at all?  Gets rid of one
> element of uncertainty - load order.

As Mark points out, they are not referenced by the
bootclasspath.properties, which defines the load-order.  However, they
are needed to allow Java code to compile (both our build scripts and our
Javac).

Regards,
Tim

-- 

Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message