harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vladimir Ivanov" <ivavladi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] [testing] Coverage (was Re: 37% of total test execution time is spent in a single test)
Date Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:40:11 GMT
Classes from exclude list are now specified as green.
I've update wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Coverage_information) and
coverage pages.

 Thanks,
  Vladimir


On 6/16/06, Paulex Yang <paulex.yang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Vladimir
>
> Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> >>
> >> The current reports don't provide code source linking. Are you going to
>
> >> add it?
> >
> >
> > There were no information for 'security' and 'auth' modules, but, I have
> > updated the pages and now there is source code linking for all modules.
> >
> > One more issue to discuss: excluded classes present in the coverage
> table
> > now with 0 coverage. May be it is more convenient do not have these
> > classes
> > in coverage tables at all? In this case one won't wonder why the class
> > has 0
> > coverage - go to exclude list to look at the class and decide whether
> the
> > class is really untested or just excluded from coverage, instead, all
> > really
> > uncovered classes will be shown with 0 coverage, if a class is missed in
> > coverage table – it is in exclude list.
> +1 for current "0 coverage" is not convenient. But if we can remove them
> from the report, how about just mark them in another way? say, mark the
> excluded class with different background colors?
>
> At least people don't need to care about two documents for one package.
> > Thanks,
> >   Vladimir
> >
> >
> >
> >> Now I have 2 questions/ issues to discuss:
> >> > 1) preferable VM to calculate coverage (seems, the exclude list is a
> >> > little
> >> > bit different for j9 and drlvm)
> >>
> >>
> >> If the only difference is the exclude list then I'd suggest using VM
> >> with
> >> the shortest one. :-)
> >>
> >> 2) preferable sorting mode for results (by name, by blocks or by
> >> methods)
> >>
> >>
> >> IMHO, sorting by name looks more natural.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Stepan.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> > Vladimir
> >> >
> >> > <SNIP>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------
> >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Paulex Yang
> China Software Development Lab
> IBM
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message