Tim Ellison wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> Except...
>>
>> 1) They aren't as Jimmy suggests, at least the one's I'm looking at.
>>
>> 2) the implementation in hymem.c just calls malloc()
>>
>> I'm confused.
>
> Hopefully you are no longer confused after Oliver's explanation.
Yes, although I am still confused why you would want to do this.
We have an implementation in hymem.c :
hymem_alloc_memory( HyPortLib *, int )
which looks just like
hymem_alloc_memory(int)
(if you use the right header)
and it calls what might be two radically different things.
Why do we have himem.c? Should we rename? Toss?
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
|