harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paulex Yang <paulex.y...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] [testing] Coverage (was Re: 37% of total test execution time is spent in a single test)
Date Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:55:01 GMT
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> Classes from exclude list are now specified as green.
> I've update wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Coverage_information) 
> and
> coverage pages.
>
Great, thank you, Vladimir!
> Thanks,
>  Vladimir
>
>
> On 6/16/06, Paulex Yang <paulex.yang@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Vladimir
>>
>> Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The current reports don't provide code source linking. Are you 
>> going to
>>
>> >> add it?
>> >
>> >
>> > There were no information for 'security' and 'auth' modules, but, I 
>> have
>> > updated the pages and now there is source code linking for all 
>> modules.
>> >
>> > One more issue to discuss: excluded classes present in the coverage
>> table
>> > now with 0 coverage. May be it is more convenient do not have these
>> > classes
>> > in coverage tables at all? In this case one won't wonder why the class
>> > has 0
>> > coverage - go to exclude list to look at the class and decide whether
>> the
>> > class is really untested or just excluded from coverage, instead, all
>> > really
>> > uncovered classes will be shown with 0 coverage, if a class is 
>> missed in
>> > coverage table – it is in exclude list.
>> +1 for current "0 coverage" is not convenient. But if we can remove them
>> from the report, how about just mark them in another way? say, mark the
>> excluded class with different background colors?
>>
>> At least people don't need to care about two documents for one package.
>> > Thanks,
>> >   Vladimir
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> Now I have 2 questions/ issues to discuss:
>> >> > 1) preferable VM to calculate coverage (seems, the exclude list 
>> is a
>> >> > little
>> >> > bit different for j9 and drlvm)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If the only difference is the exclude list then I'd suggest using VM
>> >> with
>> >> the shortest one. :-)
>> >>
>> >> 2) preferable sorting mode for results (by name, by blocks or by
>> >> methods)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> IMHO, sorting by name looks more natural.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Stepan.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> > Vladimir
>> >> >
>> >> > <SNIP>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: 
>> harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Paulex Yang
>> China Software Development Lab
>> IBM
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>


-- 
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Lab
IBM



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message