Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 64.74.244.71 is neither permitted nor
 denied by domain of geir@pobox.com)
Message-ID: <447C3DB7.4000001@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 05:42:31 -0700
From: Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com>
Reply-To: geir@pobox.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: OPEN Specification
References: <ddda44ee0605290724o34fd976bo7951299ba4ee7b22@mail.gmail.com>
 <447B183F.5030607@sablevm.org>
In-Reply-To: <447B183F.5030607@sablevm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Etienne Gagnon wrote:
> Hi Anton,
> 
> Are you proposing that all Harmony JVMs must abide by the OPEN proposal?

I won't attempt to speak for Anton, but IMO, "no".

Right now, any JVM that works w/ Harmony classlib must simply support 
the class library's virtual machine interface.

>  If yes, I think that some process has to be put in place to present and
> discuss each of this proposal's part, and dedicate time to do so.  IMO,
> I don't think that everyone (in the JVM sub-communityof Harmony) can
> simply read through this proposal and be able to make an enlightened
> decision about it.  I think that each point would gain much from being
> presented along the motivation behind it.

Yes, I think that we'll need lots of discussion around this proposal.

In the future, can we prefix subject lines related to this with [OPEN] 
or such so poeple interested in the subject can easily identify threads 
related to it?

geir

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org