Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39650 invoked from network); 19 May 2006 18:57:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 May 2006 18:57:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 65552 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2006 18:57:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65508 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2006 18:57:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65497 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2006 18:57:22 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:57:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [69.9.190.6] (HELO lox.whirlycott.com) (69.9.190.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 11:57:21 -0700 Received: (qmail 13679 invoked by uid 1016); 19 May 2006 18:57:00 -0000 Received: from 70.36.208.192 by lox.whirlycott.com (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87.1/1179. Clear:RC:1(70.36.208.192):. Processed in 0.307062 secs); 19 May 2006 18:57:00 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: stefano@apache.org via lox.whirlycott.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(70.36.208.192):. Processed in 0.307062 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (stefano@ormaz.it@70.36.208.192) by lox.whirlycott.com with ESMTPA; 19 May 2006 18:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <446E14FA.2090109@apache.org> Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 11:56:58 -0700 From: Stefano Mazzocchi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: So today Sun announced... References: <446A100F.6080503@pobox.com> <200605191438.03324.chris.gray@kiffer.be> <446DC0C0.3020408@pobox.com> <200605191659.54133.chris.gray@kiffer.be> In-Reply-To: <200605191659.54133.chris.gray@kiffer.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Chris Gray wrote: > Geir, > > I'll grant you that Sun could handle the Java community much worse than they > do, but I still don't agree that having such a corporation in charge is a > Good Thing. Or maybe I'm just being old-fashioned, and we should get rid of > all those fuddy-duddy organisations like IETF or W3C and replace them by > dynamic share-holder-value-driven corporations. :-) Chris, evolutions are more effective than resolutions because they are more easily reversible and if we apply basic thermodynamical principles to complex systems (including social ones), entropy (aka disorder) increases only when there are irreversible changes. Apache has been able to achieve many wonderful things with very high social energy efficiency because of the above (which is easier to do when you have a volunteer organization full of naturally lazy people, I must say). I have not participated in the Java SE expert group at the JCP, but I know the people from Apache that had. Harmony is not about changing the way Java specs are designed or cooked, or whether or not that's good or bad. That's another story and it's a completely separate concern which doesn't really belong here. We are deeply thankful to Sun for having slowly but surely continued to open up Java at evolutionary steps and the collective wealth generated by this was tremendous (some Sun's stock owners would have liked to have a share of that wealth, but that's life) I owe Sun a lot for that and my push for Harmony is to help them back, realizing that there is a lot that can be gained by harvesting that wealth that they helped generating, and not a lot to lose. There is no need for an hostile takeover to a company that was rarely hostile in the first place. No, I'm not in love with the JCP, the java IP situation, the TCK NDA, the lack of Swing TCK and a bunch of other issues, but could be a lot worse. Our goal here is to get Harmony certified. What happens after that is honestly a little premature to forecast, but a JVM built by the java people for the java people can only go in one direction: compatibility. The ASF has a 8-years-old continuous record of that. Now, let's go back to let the code speak. -- Stefano. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org