Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53495 invoked from network); 16 May 2006 15:05:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 May 2006 15:05:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 64949 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2006 15:05:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64874 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2006 15:05:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64773 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2006 15:05:41 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:05:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [134.134.136.20] (HELO orsmga101-1.jf.intel.com) (134.134.136.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 08:05:38 -0700 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101-1.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 May 2006 08:05:17 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx332.fm.intel.com (HELO fmsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com) ([132.233.42.148]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 May 2006 08:04:01 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.05,134,1146466800"; d="scan'208"; a="37002465:sNHT8755332747" Received: from fmsmsx311.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.214]) by fmsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 16 May 2006 08:04:00 -0700 Received: from mssmsx402.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.125.2.12]) by fmsmsx311.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 16 May 2006 08:03:59 -0700 Received: from [10.125.151.180] ([10.125.151.180]) by mssmsx402.ccr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 16 May 2006 19:03:56 +0400 Message-ID: <4469E9B9.8000507@Intel.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:03:21 +0400 From: Salikh Zakirov User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DRLVM] build process improvement References: <23951bd90605160523t2e151920xb901ec38452b3627@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <23951bd90605160523t2e151920xb901ec38452b3627@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2006 15:03:56.0397 (UTC) FILETIME=[F416E9D0:01C678F9] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vladimir Gorr wrote: > My personal opinion is we need to improve the existent build system for > DRLVM contribution. > ... > Therefore there are no needs to compile them each of participants. It'd be > fine to have these sources pre-compiled (another snapshot?) The idea of having something precompiled looks close to idea of HDK (Harmony Development Kit): to have a binary bundle which makes development of Harmony as convenient as possible. I think having third party libraries precompiled qualifies as making DRLVM developer life easier, so it is well worth of implementing in HDK. As far as I remember, the consensus about HDK was that it would be a good thing, but nobody yet volunteered to do it. -- Salikh --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org