Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of vvgorr@gmail.com designates
 64.233.166.182 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=EVxCz22UchWGbxGCNUEBBqZq2WDmUp2vyuW9Z6rfDsnuF1vlJLQYNmHsXN0K86yNxOAIajPJ9q8jcZuhjVbHeRCfbAUkjp/zbaqvOcWRchD92itEv7gWvAhpex6An1fthSYxdSznOElI+dQT0ywmcpr1O1x9DYYR8p0zWevm71E=
Message-ID: <23951bd90605260439r4f7c19aam3e3e9eef3df40e51@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 18:39:59 +0700
From: "Vladimir Gorr" <vvgorr@gmail.com>
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: classlib build problem?
In-Reply-To: <4476E6AC.1040008@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_13968_8993805.1148643599053"
References: <c3755b3a0605260118v40f0f7c5t827927942a891040@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200605260828.k4Q8SlA9022087@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
	 <c3755b3a0605260131x3e6c9b08q94309b4541a5ba59@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4476CF09.3020501@gmail.com>
	 <23951bd90605260307y55df8f35o5b2832b72f901ebc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4476D919.7060408@gmail.com>
	 <23951bd90605260357r42c0601ey999bef230906d855@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4476E6AC.1040008@gmail.com>

------=_Part_13968_8993805.1148643599053
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 5/26/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Vladimir Gorr wrote:
> > On 5/26/06, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Vladimir Gorr wrote:
> >> > maybe does it make sense adding the RI rt.jar to CLASSPATH for the
> >> > ECJ-based
> >> > compiler?
> >> > In this case all we didn't implemented will be taken from RI. Is thi=
s
> a
> >> > stupid idea?
> >>
> >> You can add the RI's class libraries using a command-line option if yo=
u
> >> so choose, but I don;t think we should build the Harmony javac to have
> >> dependencies upon the RI.
> >
> > Ok, I see and absolutely agree with you. But I have one question :-).
> > Suppose API developers will import some unimplemented (into Harmony)
> class
> > for the development needs
> > and build with Sun's compiler (He will see no any compiler's errors).
> > Are there the dependencies upon the RI for Harmony javac in this case?
>
> Sorry, I don't understand the question.
>
> By default, our javac will run on the Harmony JRE and compile against
> the Harmony class libraries (i.e. no dependencies on the RI at all).
>
> However, it is possible against any other class libraries, including the
> RI (e.g. javac -cp rt.jar Foo.java).  The compiler is still running on
> the Harmony JRE.
>
> Does that answer your question?


Yes, thanks. My misunderstanding was we use the Sun's compiler to build the
Harmony classes.
Sorry for this.

Vladimir.


Regards,
> Tim
>
> --
>
> Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
> IBM Java technology centre, UK.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: harmony-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

------=_Part_13968_8993805.1148643599053--